Dream app vs. real budget
You have a real vision, but the monthly spend still has to work in the real world.
Frustrated? Let's build that app.
AI folds time. It also folds the cost of software development. BackTheApp combines AI with senior architects who love to build, so the first step is not a proposal, a discovery phase, or a big upfront invoice.
Tell us the app you wish existed. Add a monthly commitment that feels affordable to you. If the idea has enough signal, it moves into the queue, and we keep building from that queue every day until demand turns into working software.
Priority Engine
Start with the idea, then balance value and scope to see what moves first in the delivery queue.
Budget presets
Scope presets
Start the conversation
We review reasonableness by comparing expected application value with monthly commitment so delivery planning starts from reality.
Score: 267 | Rank: 1 of 2
Your idea is valued at ¤1,000,000, with application value of ¤100,000, and monthly contribution of ¤0. This represents an moderate application profile, top 3 tier—exceptional positioning against peer applications. Your commitment pattern suggests you're early exploration phase. Consider adjusting your values above if this assessment doesn't match your intentions.
These values determine your ranking. Weekly development focus is typically the top 10 by rank. Adjust values above to see your position change.
The struggle
Traditional development offers are often a black box. You get a quote, a promise, and a lot of uncertainty about what features will really land first.
You have a real vision, but the monthly spend still has to work in the real world.
Most offers do not show how cost, scope, and delivery speed actually connect before you commit.
You should not have to fund a project without understanding what gets built first and how fast progress will move.
Today's queue (UTC)
Queue order is recalculated shortly after midnight UTC and published as a daily snapshot.
Snapshot date: 2026-05-13 02:00 UTCMay 13, 2026 2:00 AM UTC
| Rank | Application | Band | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BackTheApp | Focused | 19.63 |
The struggle
Traditional development offers are often a black box. You get a quote, a promise, and a lot of uncertainty about what features will really land first.
You have a real vision, but the monthly spend still has to work in the real world.
Most offers do not show how cost, scope, and delivery speed actually connect before you commit.
You should not have to fund a project without understanding what gets built first and how fast progress will move.
The plan
Start with what you want, what you believe it is worth, and what you can commit monthly. That value-to-commitment ratio tells us whether the idea is practical to deliver.
Describe the workflow, customer experience, or operational problem you want the app to solve.
Share the business value you expect from the application when it is delivered.
Value and monthly commitment together determine whether the proposal is reasonable, like $1,000 value with $50 monthly versus $1,000,000 value with $50 monthly.
Value and benefits
No more waiting for features you cannot afford. No more guessing what happens next. Just a clearer path from budget to delivery.
The factory retains ownership while a subscription is active. Exit requires subscriber purchase and is final.
Ideas are reviewed for value, complexity, and delivery fit before work moves forward.
Initial operations are aligned to Pacific through Eastern North American time zones.
Questions buyers ask first
You describe the application, suggest the monthly amount, and the work is evaluated around a subscription-based delivery model.
Internal tools, operational dashboards, workflow software, and customer-facing experiences are all in scope for evaluation.
The factory retains ownership while subscription support is in play. To exit as a product, the active subscribers must purchase it, ownership transfers to those subscribers, and the application cannot re-enter the software factory for maintenance. Exit is one-time and post-exit maintenance is fully owned by the subscriber owners.
Trust and proof
The blog is where BackTheApp will show delivery examples, service evolution, and the kind of outcomes customers can expect as the platform matures.
The landing page should remain publicly accessible, while the MCP service validates JWTs before serving protected published-content requests.
Read the postCustom domains on containerized Azure App Service are operationally manageable when the rollout starts with the `www` subdomain path and treats DNS, certificate binding, and redirect behavior as first-class work.
Read the post